Progressive Revelation The three historic monotheistic faiths reflect different ways of understanding revelation from God. As a generalization, both historic Judaism & Christianity understand Scripture to be the record of an unfolding or progressive revelation from God. The books of the prophets & hymns and wisdom do not supplant the books of Moses but rather build on them. Isaiah did not replace Moses, nor Jeremiah, Isaiah, nor Jesus, Jeremiah.
However, in some quarters of Christianity there have been those who either by argument or practice hold that the God of the N.T. is essentially different than the god of the Hebrew Bible and that the N.T. does indeed supercede & supplant the Hebrew Bible. Even during the Protestant Reformation it was argued that "Moses is dea. His rule ended when Christ came. He is of no further service." (Luther)
Similarly, in some ways, Islam also sees a succession of revelations, each superceding & replacing the previous. Hence, while recognizing "the Book" of Judaism and Christianity, the Quran is the ultimate revelation. While Abraham. Moses & Jesus are recognized as historic prophets of God, they have been superceded by the one prophet, Mohammed.
. |
Diachronic Approaches Growing out of an understanding of Scripture as progressive revelation, a a diachronic (through time) approach to biblical theology seeks to study the theology of the Hebrew Bible as it unfolds over time.
A diachronic approach tends to look to see if the texts give indication of organic connections. It tends to focus on intertextual developments.
A diachronic approach is taken by G. von Rad (OTT, 1962, 1965), W.C. Kaiser (TOTT, 1978), E. Martens (GD, 1981, 1994), W. VanGemeren (PR, 1988,1995) et al. |
Synchronic Approaches Influenced by classical theology in which biblical teaching tends to be categorized by topic or theme. These categories may reflect periods of resolving doctrinal controversy in the history of the church.
A synchronic (simultaneous, in unison) approach to biblical theology will tend to be organized around a system of doctrines. This "system" of teaching may reflect the historic development of those teachings within a given faith community.
A synchronic approach is taken by W. Eichrodt (TOT, 1961, 1967) Th. Vriezen (OOTT, ), R. Clements (OTT, 1978), B. Childs (OTTCC, 1986), et al. |
|