Ch. 9 Public Relations
the use of information to influence public
opinion
|
|
PR is part of the marketing and promotional
mix
|
|
it must work in conjunction with advertising
and marketing strategies
|
ex. if Walmart runs a PR campaign touting "made in America" products" it better sell "made in America" products (and be prepared to answer questions if it doesn't) |
|
Advertising and PR
|
1. Media approach |
PR looks for publicity (free messages)
|
has more contact with media gatekeepers (a media contact list/media relations) |
goals are often different - ex. change
attitudes, create goodwill, show support for a particular point of view
|
|
2. control and credibility |
PR has less control over the message,
it can send suggested copy but media outlets ultimately create the copy
as they see fit
|
if the media delivers your message, it
is more credible than if you deliver it yourself (perceived bias)
|
|
Trends
|
it's not just for large corporations anymore |
media intensity |
issue orientation |
complexities of large corporations |
global reach |
|
The core of PR
|
1. the need to understand "publics" |
translating information into understandable
terms
|
using tone - conveying the same information
to different publics
|
|
publics to consider
|
customers |
employees (various levels) |
government |
community |
industry |
supply/demand chain |
media |
stockholders |
donors/investors |
|
2. Analysis of publics |
a. what publics are important (most important) to my organization? |
both now, and in the future
|
|
b. what do these publics think? |
why do they think that way?
|
is the way they think changing? why(or
why not)?
|
public OPINION - not necessarily based
on fact, often a perception or belief open to persuasive argument
|
|
c. what would we like them to think? |
|
d. how best do we persuade them to change (or reinforce) their thinking? |
|
e. is this a one time or long term communication? |
|
f. how do we measure public opinion? |
polls, focus groups, surveys (inside or outside) |
g. how do we evaluate effectiveness? |
process evaluation - how effective was
the PR department in getting the message out?
|
outcome evaluation - did the PR campaign
meet its goals?
|
was the cost justified to achieve those goals? |
|
The role of ethics
|
PR is often perceived as "spin" or half-truths |
PRSA Code |
a note: it is improper to give gifts to the media in order to get coverage |
|
The tools: |
1. News releases |
information (a news story) that an organization
wants to make public through the media
|
|
a news release should make the media's
job easier, not yours!
|
|
be concise (time/space issues) |
be precise (make sure the content answers relevant questions about the story) |
emphasize (an editor wants to know why this story is newsworthy) all the material we learned in the broadcast journalism section - newsworthiness, leads etc. fits here |
if you can do these three things well, a news editor is more likely to use your news release (in some form) rather than toss it |
|
Format: |
a.Masthead (letterhead) - an identifying logo, this helps the editor identify who you represent, as you become familiar and credible, the masthead helps single out your news release from the others |
|
b.Slug |
1) date
|
2) contact info
|
(prioritize by ease of contact, for local release, phone # should come first) |
3) release time
|
"for immediate release"
|
embargoed - "for release after..."
|
|
c. Dateline - geographic location - |
|
d. Lead - usually a summary or hard news lead. The lead paragraph should be able to tell the story |
|
e. Supporting information - additional info that fleshes out the story (don't go overboard, one page is almost always sufficient) |
|
f. Boilerplate - background info about the organization that is included as part of every news release |
|
g. end que (###) |
|
Other issues: |
is this a release for print or broadcast? |
if broadcast, things like phonetics are
important to include
|
|
video news releases (VNRs) - as cost of video goes down, VNRs are more cost effective, though TV news is reluctant to use them. It may be better suited for other publics. |
|
How do you know if a news release is successful? |
if the info gets out, it doesn't matter
if the news release is used as is, or is "mined"
|
|
2. letters |
Why am I writing the letter?
|
explanation (ex. how something works or a process) |
answering complaints |
raising funds |
|
Is there something I want the reader
to do after reading the letter?
|
|
p. 352, Figure 9.3 |
|
letters should take a more direct, personal
approach than news releases
|
(generally, writing to one, not a mass)
|
|
be concise |
be precise |
be aware of tone - be personal and professional |
how?
|
be straightforward |
don't attempt to be humorous |
avoid reference to personal feelings |
ex. "I know you are upset because
..."
|
but, use personal pronouns (you) |
use active voice, not passive |
avoid technical language |
if you have to refer to rules/regulations
etc. spell them out clearly
|
|
Format |
p. 350, Figure 9-2 |
|
3. Other written media |
for these options, the same questions
can be asked - what purpose? what public? what proposed result?
|
|
Each of these may require special skills
or outside help (ex. desktop publishing or web design)
|
|
a. newsletters |
can be internal or external |
regular or periodic |
can be low quality - photocopies or high quality - 4 color glossies |
|
uses: |
building morale |
providing new information: updates, policy changes, new hires etc. |
addressing employee concerns |
|
humor may be okay |
Why should someone read this? |
Is there anything you want them to do? |
|
b. pamphlets and brochures |
usually external |
non-periodic |
published for a specific purpose |
must generate interest (why read?) |
anything from assembly instructions to new product introductions to new policies to issue advocacy etc. |
|
c. annual reports |
a legal requirement for stock-issuing companies |
may be quarterly or semi-annually |
even if not a legal requirement, many organizations still produce them |
tells how an organization is doing and where they are going |
highlights opportunities (and challenges) |
includes an executive summary - key points that someone can read to get a sense of what's inside |
usually has to convey financial information/data |
must be aware that several publics will read these but from vastly different perspectives |
ex. stockholders vs. employees
|
|
d. websites |
must be:
|
user friendly |
easy to navigate (links, loops) |
easy to load |
easy to find contact info |
easy to learn the web address |
software compatible - esp. if there are audio/video files |
easy to access - are there times when traffic might be heavy? |
|
4. news conferences, speaking engagements |
|
key questions: |
who will represent the organization? |
who is qualified?
|
who is capable?
|
when will they be held? |
where will they be held? |
who is the audience? |
who is invited?
|
what resources are available ? (overheads, powerpoint, Internet access, VCRs, DVDs etc.) |
are there legal issues involved? |
|
Crisis management |
you never know...
|
natural disasters |
equipment or human failure |
crime |
lawsuits |
accidents |
environmental issues |
financial scandal |
product tampering |
and on and on...
|
|
How should you respond? |
1. state the issues |
focus on people (those who are affected) |
be accurate
|
be honest
|
be simple
|
|
2. define problem areas |
tell how the problem is being addressed
|
be open to criticism if legitimate
|
prepare for tough questions
|
|
3. identify new issues as the arise |
be timely
|
give updates as needed
|
|
4. keep moving forward |
don't dwell on the past
|
|
overall, |
find the right people
|
speak with a unified voice
|
keep focused
|
remember core principles
|
don't be afraid to say "I don't
know"
|
consult with legal representation as
needed
|
|
|