Structural Analysis |
|
Media doesn't mirror reality |
it structures and manipulates reality into organized patterns for efficiency's sake
|
(coding systems)
|
the way media shapes reality may not match up with the way audiences interpret that shaping
|
ex. crime shows (forensics)
|
|
Building Blocks of Codes |
1. Symbols - organizing ideas that attach meaning to words or images |
question - do people have the necessary skills to interpret symbols?
|
ex. a rainbow
|
symbols are often culturally bound
|
Symbols can be:
|
Personal - held by an individual or small group, can be deeply significant but aren't of much communication value beyond the small group
|
Social - held by larger groups or even an entire culture, these symbols are well positioned to be used by the media (or changed by the media)
|
ex. Native American mascots
|
|
Tropes/Memes/Stereotypes
|
|
Archetypal - when symbols cross cultures and become universal
|
ex. Mickey Mouse? Coke? the Cross?
|
|
symbols can increase or decrease in significance over time
|
|
when media choices are small, the media can be a powerful symbol creator, when media choices are large, it can lose that power
|
|
Symbols can be typed into larger constructs |
1. Ritual - an act or series of acts which bring about a satisfactory resolution to a problem
|
ex. Home Improvement - how Tim gets in/out of trouble
|
2. Mystique - when audiences believe the ritual solves the problem
|
in reality or in media
|
ex. is this how a comedy should be structured?
|
is this how I should strucure problem solving?
|
either can become "sacred" - you can't mess with the structure
|
3. Myth
|
when mystique becomes so infused it becomes a value or faith statement (told and retold)
|
ex. Aesop's fables, parables
|
can be true, based on truth, or made up
|
myth can be universal, culture specific, subcultural
|
ex. gods, ancient aliens, Yeti/Bigfoot, Loch Ness Monster
|
|
Star Trek "Bread and Circuses" (1968)
|
|
is Star Trek a "Wagon Train to the Stars" or "Horatio Hornblower in Space"? |
inspiration from the President's Science Advisory Council in 1958? |
|